Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve
Spoken byMax Planck1858–1947 · German theoretical physicist, Nobel Prize in Physics 1918
Planck’s answer to James Murphy in “Epilogue: A Socratic Dialogue. Planck–Einstein–Murphy,” in Where Is Science Going? (New York: W. W. Norton, 1932), p. 217. The edition credits the translation to James Murphy. The popular wording matches the printed English text word for word.
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve” Max Planck, Where Is Science Going?, trans. James Murphy (New York: W. W. Norton, 1932), Epilogue, p. 217.
Image direction — grounded in this quote’s real context; paste into your image tool
In context
Evoking the world of Max Planck — German theoretical physicist, founder of quantum theory. Theme: "Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve". Atmospheric and restrained, cinematic directional light, a muted period-appropriate palette, fine grain and texture. Compose with generous empty space for the quote and a small credit line. No lettering in the image itself.
Minimalist
Minimalist editorial slide for the quote "Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve". Clean background, a single muted accent color, generous negative space, subtle paper or linen texture, no literal illustration — let the words carry it. Reserve clear space for a serif quote and a small credit line. No lettering in the image itself.
Provenance
Where the line actually appears
Work
Where Is Science Going?
Section
Epilogue: A Socratic Dialogue. Planck–Einstein–Murphy, p. 217
Published
New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1932 (First Edition), with a prologue by Albert Einstein
Translation
“Translation and biographical note by James Murphy” (title page)
MURPHY: You have often said that the progress of science consists in the discovery of a new mystery the moment one thinks that something fundamental has been solved. …
PLANCK: As to the first point, that about the discovery of new mysteries. This is undoubtedly true. Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve. Music and art are, to an extent, also attempts to solve or at least to express the mystery. But to my mind the more we progress with either the more we are brought into harmony with all nature itself. And that is one of the great services of science to the individual.
Epilogue, p. 217
Transcribed from the Internet Archive’s OCR text of the 1932 Norton first edition. Hyphenation from line breaks has been joined.
The exact sentence is on p. 217 of the 1932 Norton first edition, in Planck’s reply to Murphy (Internet Archive full text ↗).
Wikiquote’s sourced quotes for Planck list it under Where is Science Going? (1932), “Epilogue, p. 217,” along with two shorter variants (Wikiquote: Max Planck ↗).
The Marginalian also quotes the line and says it comes from the Socratic dialogue with Einstein at the end of the 1932 book (The Marginalian ↗).
The line is printed in the English text of Where Is Science Going?, first published in 1932 by W. W. Norton with a copyright notice. Under our conservative rule, a work first published in 1931 or later is treated as in copyright in the US. We have not checked the renewal records.
Rights status is our research, not legal advice — and copyright varies by country and edition. For commercial or published use, confirm with the rightsholder. See terms.
Fact-check
Real quote, loosely copied
The attribution is correct. What drifts online is the wording, and the setting the line is said to come from.
~
Wording“…we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve” Shortened
This common variant drops “of nature and therefore part.” In the 1932 text, Planck first says we are part of nature and only then part of the mystery. Wikiquote lists this form as a variant (Wikiquote ↗).
~
Wording“…for in the final analysis we ourselves are part of the mystery we are trying to solve” Reworded
This variant merges the two sentences into one and changes “last analysis” to “final analysis.” That wording is not in the 1932 English edition. Wikiquote lists it as a variant (Wikiquote ↗).
✕
Setting“From a dialogue with Einstein” Imprecise
Einstein is one of the three speakers in the book’s closing dialogue, but Planck is not answering him here. He is answering a question from James Murphy, the book’s translator (1932 text, p. 217 ↗).
✓The full popular wording matches Planck’s reply on p. 217 of Where Is Science Going? (Norton, 1932) word for word (Internet Archive ↗).
Context
Why it mattered
Where Is Science Going? was published in 1932, when quantum theory was challenging the old idea of strict causality. The book ends with a “Socratic dialogue” between Planck, Einstein and James Murphy. In this exchange, Murphy brings up Planck’s often-repeated view that every scientific advance uncovers a new mystery. Planck agrees, and explains why: the scientist is part of what he is studying.
He goes straight on to music and art. He calls them attempts “to solve or at least to express the mystery,” and says that progress in either brings us “into harmony with all nature itself.”
We ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.
Explore
Filed under
More provenance-checked quotes on the same theme, each with its reuse status.
1858–1947 · German theoretical physicist, founder of quantum theory
Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck was the German physicist whose work on energy quanta launched quantum theory. He won the 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics. In his later years he wrote and lectured widely on causality, free will and how science relates to religion. Where Is Science Going? (1932) collects that thinking for English readers.
For writers & researchers
Cite this
Primary source
Max Planck, Where Is Science Going?, prologue by Albert Einstein, translation and biographical note by James Murphy (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1932), Epilogue: “A Socratic Dialogue,” 217.
This verification page
Quotle.info. “Who really said ‘Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve’?” Last verified 3 Nov 2026. https://quotle.info/who-said/science-cannot-solve-the-ultimate-mystery-of-nature-and/