Straight from today’s Quotle — here’s who really said it, and the story behind it. Play again

Who really said it

Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve

Spoken by Max Planck
Attribution status: Verified Reuse status: In copyright

Planck’s answer to James Murphy in “Epilogue: A Socratic Dialogue. Planck–Einstein–Murphy,” in Where Is Science Going? (New York: W. W. Norton, 1932), p. 217. The edition credits the translation to James Murphy. The popular wording matches the printed English text word for word.

Last verified 3 Nov 2026 · how we verify · spot an error?

For presentations

Put it on a slide

Verified quote & credit

“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve” Max Planck, Where Is Science Going?, trans. James Murphy (New York: W. W. Norton, 1932), Epilogue, p. 217.

Can you use it?

Still under copyright (rights held by W. W. Norton & Company (copyright 1932); English translation by James Murphy). A short, credited quote is generally fine for talks, teaching, and internal decks; for commercial, published, or large-scale reuse, get permission.

Image direction — grounded in this quote’s real context; paste into your image tool

In context

Evoking the world of Max Planck — German theoretical physicist, founder of quantum theory. Theme: "Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve". Atmospheric and restrained, cinematic directional light, a muted period-appropriate palette, fine grain and texture. Compose with generous empty space for the quote and a small credit line. No lettering in the image itself.

Minimalist

Minimalist editorial slide for the quote "Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve". Clean background, a single muted accent color, generous negative space, subtle paper or linen texture, no literal illustration — let the words carry it. Reserve clear space for a serif quote and a small credit line. No lettering in the image itself.

Provenance

Where the line actually appears

Work
Where Is Science Going?
Section
Epilogue: A Socratic Dialogue. Planck–Einstein–Murphy, p. 217
Published
New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1932 (First Edition), with a prologue by Albert Einstein
Translation
“Translation and biographical note by James Murphy” (title page)

MURPHY: You have often said that the progress of science consists in the discovery of a new mystery the moment one thinks that something fundamental has been solved. …

PLANCK: As to the first point, that about the discovery of new mysteries. This is undoubtedly true. Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve. Music and art are, to an extent, also attempts to solve or at least to express the mystery. But to my mind the more we progress with either the more we are brought into harmony with all nature itself. And that is one of the great services of science to the individual. Epilogue, p. 217

Transcribed from the Internet Archive’s OCR text of the 1932 Norton first edition. Hyphenation from line breaks has been joined.

Full text of Where Is Science Going? (1932), Internet Archive

How we verified this

  • The exact sentence is on p. 217 of the 1932 Norton first edition, in Planck’s reply to Murphy (Internet Archive full text ↗).
  • Wikiquote’s sourced quotes for Planck list it under Where is Science Going? (1932), “Epilogue, p. 217,” along with two shorter variants (Wikiquote: Max Planck ↗).
  • The Marginalian also quotes the line and says it comes from the Socratic dialogue with Einstein at the end of the 1932 book (The Marginalian ↗).

Fact-check

Real quote, loosely copied

The attribution is correct. What drifts online is the wording, and the setting the line is said to come from.

Wording“…we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve” Shortened

This common variant drops “of nature and therefore part.” In the 1932 text, Planck first says we are part of nature and only then part of the mystery. Wikiquote lists this form as a variant (Wikiquote ↗).

Wording“…for in the final analysis we ourselves are part of the mystery we are trying to solve” Reworded

This variant merges the two sentences into one and changes “last analysis” to “final analysis.” That wording is not in the 1932 English edition. Wikiquote lists it as a variant (Wikiquote ↗).

Setting“From a dialogue with Einstein” Imprecise

Einstein is one of the three speakers in the book’s closing dialogue, but Planck is not answering him here. He is answering a question from James Murphy, the book’s translator (1932 text, p. 217 ↗).

The full popular wording matches Planck’s reply on p. 217 of Where Is Science Going? (Norton, 1932) word for word (Internet Archive ↗).

Context

Why it mattered

Where Is Science Going? was published in 1932, when quantum theory was challenging the old idea of strict causality. The book ends with a “Socratic dialogue” between Planck, Einstein and James Murphy. In this exchange, Murphy brings up Planck’s often-repeated view that every scientific advance uncovers a new mystery. Planck agrees, and explains why: the scientist is part of what he is studying.

He goes straight on to music and art. He calls them attempts “to solve or at least to express the mystery,” and says that progress in either brings us “into harmony with all nature itself.”

We ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.

Explore

Filed under

More provenance-checked quotes on the same theme, each with its reuse status.

Go further

Dig deeper

Trusted places to keep pulling the thread — primary archives, fact-checks, and scholarship. We show how we used each one before you leave.

The author

About Max Planck

Max Planck

1858–1947 · German theoretical physicist, founder of quantum theory

Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck was the German physicist whose work on energy quanta launched quantum theory. He won the 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics. In his later years he wrote and lectured widely on causality, free will and how science relates to religion. Where Is Science Going? (1932) collects that thinking for English readers.

For writers & researchers

Cite this

Primary source

Max Planck, Where Is Science Going?, prologue by Albert Einstein, translation and biographical note by James Murphy (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1932), Epilogue: “A Socratic Dialogue,” 217.

This verification page

Quotle.info. “Who really said ‘Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve’?” Last verified 3 Nov 2026. https://quotle.info/who-said/science-cannot-solve-the-ultimate-mystery-of-nature-and/

Something wrong on this page?

Tell us what’s off. A link helps but isn’t required — “this is the wrong person” is a useful report on its own. Nothing here changes the page directly; it goes to our review queue and a human checks it.

Only used to tell you if we act on your report. We never sell or share it.

Copied